Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV516
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy