Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +76271%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2009
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
2
6144
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GT216
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy