Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +28641%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2007
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy