Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +5503%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
448bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
24
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
28
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy