Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +19263%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy