NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+1729%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
51W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GK107
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
