NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 1024GB/s)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1800MHz vs 1746MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13.41 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI60
+9%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2018
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
1024GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
64
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
4096
240
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.373 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
Vega 20
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GL
GCN 5.1
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
