Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +2981%
19.17 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
512bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
30
6144
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy