CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
VS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+1339%
19.17 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VS
Tesla C2090
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA A100 PCIe vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
4
NVIDIA L4 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
6
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
7
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
8
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A10G
9
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
10
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy