Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1339%
19.17 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
16
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy