Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2260

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
12760 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +163100%
65.28 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
40
400
TMUs
4
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
15W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV620
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy