Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +8347%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
16
18176
Shading Units
512
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
48
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
375W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GF100
AD102
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy