Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +14017%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
512
568
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
AD102
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy