Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +56812%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
8
18176
Shading Units
64
568
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
105W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
G92
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy