CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
VS
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1816MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
+31968%
9.3 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
VS
Quadro NVS 290
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
652 MHz
Base Clock
-
1816 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
87.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
145.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.3 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
2
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
3
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
4
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
6
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
7
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
8
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
9
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
10
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy