CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 12 GB
+390%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 12 GB
VS
Quadro K4100M
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
26
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
1152
104
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA T1000 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 GA104 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
4
NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
5
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
7
NVIDIA Tesla P10 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy