Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1612MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +169%
22.22 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
7168
80
TMUs
448
48
ROPs
0
80
Tensor Cores
448
20
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
100 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net