Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1612MHz vs 1537MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +31%
8.253 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
6.296 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded +247%
2001
RTX A500 Mobile
576
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded +292%
271
RTX A500 Mobile
69

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
64
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.18 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net