Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +78%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
8192
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy