CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+78%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
8192
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy