NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+31642%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
