Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2050MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +103%
16.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net