NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1612MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+55%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
945 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
1920
80
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
240
20
RT Cores
30
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
10.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
