NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+35782%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
1
2560
Shading Units
8
80
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
