NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2100MHz vs 1687MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+1791%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
