Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +1330%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
256
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy