Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +4245%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
64
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy