Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +26642%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy