Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +2032%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Mobile +5719%
1222
Quadro K1000M
21
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy