NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+298%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
