Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +1749%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy