Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +145%
8.637 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Mobile +52%
84
Tesla K20c
55

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2496
80
TMUs
208
48
ROPs
40
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net