CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+6188%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
VS
Quadro FX 2700M
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
6
3328
Shading Units
48
104
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
G94
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy