Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +1628%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
24
3328
Shading Units
192
104
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GT200B
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy