Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +271%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
1024
104
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GM204
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy