Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1543MHz vs 1200MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +44%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
14
3328
Shading Units
1792
104
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GP104
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
12 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy