NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1537MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+26%
7.987 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
6.296 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000
+96%
5936
RTX A500 Mobile
3023
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000
+69%
2712
RTX A500 Mobile
1604
3DMark Speed Way
RTX A2000
+210%
1480
RTX A500 Mobile
476
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
16
3328
Shading Units
2048
104
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
64
26
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.18 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GA107S
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
12 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
