Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +8356%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy