NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+3282%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
