NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1762MHz vs 1750MHz)
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A400
2091
Arc A310
+46%
3061
3DMark Speed Way
RTX A400
+32%
308
Arc A310
232
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
96
6
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
