Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 Mobile +25571%
17.2 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
4
5120
Shading Units
32
160
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
17.20 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

115W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy