Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 +5780%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy