Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H +49053%
19.17 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
2
6144
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

140W
TDP
18W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GT218
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy