NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+206%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A4500 Embedded
+84%
9884
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
5349
Blender
RTX A4500 Embedded
+141%
3920
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
1623
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1317%
482
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
34
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
30
5888
Shading Units
1920
184
TMUs
120
96
ROPs
64
184
Tensor Cores
240
46
RT Cores
30
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
TU106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
