NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
5856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+21258%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
4
5888
Shading Units
32
184
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
