NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1700MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+313%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
6656
64
TMUs
416
32
ROPs
0
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
