Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +4539%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
4
7424
Shading Units
192
232
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy