Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +4720%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
24
7424
Shading Units
192
232
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy