Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro S9000

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +157%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Aug 2012
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy