Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +58%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jul 2015
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
275W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy