Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +3%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Mar 2016
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy