Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +979%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Nov 2011
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy